-
Danilina Nina Vasil`evna -
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associated Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation.
Subject: determination of the direction of sustainable urban transport system development is one of the most relevant issues of modern transport policy. Intermodal transportation development is the usual practice in big cities and agglomerations that shows its efficiency in the field of transport problem determination by means of coordination of transport mobility of urban population. This article is devoted to the issue of “Park-and-Ride” system formation as an integral part of intermodal transportation service for territories of cities and agglomerations. Research objectives: the aim of the study was to develop a scientific justification for the system development strategy based on the methods of system analysis. Materials and methods: “Park-and-Ride” facilities are viewed as an element of transport infrastructure, i.e., organization aimed to provide long-term parking service for the population during the working day, the demand for which depends on external and internal conditions, which determined the possibility of using the SWOT analysis tool to evaluate the performance of its service. Results: transport demand depends on internal and external urban and economic conditions and can be controlled by the methods of economic management. This allows us to use SWOT-analysis to evaluate conditions influencing the work of the whole system. SWOT-analysis allows us to assess weaknesses and strengths, threats and opportunities of a Park-and-Ride system aimed to attract the motorists to its service and, as a consequence, solve a set of transport, environmental and economic issues of urban sustainable development. As the results of the present analysis, we formulated the main strategic directions of the functioning and development of the system that determine the system’s maximum effectiveness in the field of town-planning development of urbanized territories. Conclusions: application of the obtained results lies in the field of transport planning at the stage of development of the General Plans for the transport infrastructure development, as well as the development of planning solutions for incentive parking as a part of urban passenger transport and transfer hubs. We formulate the city policy directions for the “Park-and-Ride” system organization and development that are necessary in the process of transport planning of the unified transport system of cities and agglomerations.
DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2018.2.190-195
-
Zhul'kova Yuliya Nikolaevna -
Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (NNGASU)
Candidate of Economic Scienc- es, Associate Professor, Department of Real Estate, Investments, Consulting and Analysis, Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (NNGASU), 65 Il'inskaya St., Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russian Federation;
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
At the present stage the particular significance is gained by operational solutions of the problems of engaging in economic turnover of free land as a fundamental investment resource for socio-economic development of country and particular regions. The lack of obvious progress and positive dynamics of the main socio-economic indicators characterizing the growth tendency of living standard of the population and economy predetermines an essential demand in measures for effective use of land potential as a whole and in particular regions. One of the possible options for progressive social and economic development is the need for integration into the active circulation of land as an investment resource, to ensure the continued effective functioning and development facilities as well as the search for new approaches to the formation of the real estate market. With the development of land it makes sense to combine the three concepts: "development", "territory" and "quality". Thus, the qualitative development of the territory is a natural transition of land plots, which are in state, municipal, private or other forms of ownership to more perfect forms providing the ability to meet modern requirements of the market. It is expedient to apply the mechanism of combination of administrative and market ways of regulation of the specified processes to realize public policy objectives of efficient use of land fund. The mechanism for combining the efforts of the state, social and financial sectors of economy will allow to resolve most effectively the issues of ensuring the quality offered by natural and legal entities of the land plots, creating a network of infrastructures by forces of public sector, investor or through the public-private partnership, as well as enhancing the investment attractiveness of the territory. Due to the implementation of these tasks, involvement of land plots in economic circulation is accelerated and intensity of the processes of functioning of the land market increases. It provides the impulse to the development of the industrial complex, the solution of socially significant problems of housing and increase of life quality indicators of the population.
DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2014.7.156-165
References
- Weber A. Theories of Industrial Location. With the attached work of Shril: Industry in Germany Beginning from 1860. Leningrad, Moscow, Kniga Publ., 1926, 223 p.
- Launhardt W. Die Bestimmung des Zweckmassigsten Standort Einer Gewerbliehen Anlage. Zeitschrift des Vereins der Deutscher Ingeniers. 1882, b. XXVI, no. 3, pp. 105—116.
- Christaller W. Die Zentralen Orte in Suddeutschland. Jena, Gustav Fischer, 1933, 230 p.
- Losch A. Die raumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft. Jena, Gustav Fischer, 1940, 48 p.
- Izard U. Methods of Regional Analysis: An Introduction to the Science of Regions. Moscow, Science, 1966, 659 p.
- Perru F. Ekonomika 20 veka [Economy of the 20th Century]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2000, 326 p.
- Kolosovskiy N.N. Osnovy ekonomicheskogo rayonirovaniya [Fundamentals of Economic Regionalization]. Moscow, Gospolitizdat Publ., 1958, 200 p.
- Sherstobitova G.I. Rol' agroturizma v ustoychivom razvitii sel'skokhozyaystvennykh territoriy Samarskoy oblasti [The Role of Agritourism in Sustainable Development of Samara Region Rural Areas]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomicheskie nauki [Bulletin of Samara State Technical University. Series: Economical Sciences]. 2013, no. 3 (9), pp. 83—87.
- Kriulina E.N. Ustoychivoe razvitie sel'skikh territoriy kak faktor povysheniya stabil'nosti sel'skokhozyaystvennogo proizvodstva [Rural Areas Sustainable Development as a Factor of Stability Increase in Agricultural Production]. Vestnik APK Stavropol'ya [Bulletin of Agribusiness of Stavropol]. 2013, no. 2 (10), pp. 177—182.
- Kiseleva A.M. Kachestvo zhizni mestnykh soobshchestv kak faktor ustoychivogo razvitiya territorii [Life Quality of Local Communities as a Factor of Sustainable Development of the Area]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika [Proceedings of Omsk University. Series "Economics"]. 2013, no. 2, pp. 56—60.
- Drozhenko G.G., Mukhina E.G. Vliyanie razvitiya sel'skikh territoriy na sel'skokhozyaystvennoe proizvodstvo [Influence of Rural Territories Development on Agricultural Production]. Vestnik Kurganskoy GSKhA [Bulletin of Kurgan State Agricultural Academy named after T.S. Maltsev]. 2013, no. 3, pp. 9—11.
- Kochegarova L.G. Formirovanie statisticheskoy modeli otsenki privlecheniya inostrannykh investitsiy na territoriyu sub"ektov RF [Formation of the Statistical Model to Assess Foreign Investment Attractiveness of RF Subjects]. Upravlenets [Manager]. 2013, no. 4 (44), pp. 48—53.
- Kolmykova T.S., Kharchenko E.V. Problemy privlecheniya inostrannykh investitsiy [Problems of Foreign Investments’ Attraction]. Nauchnye trudy Donetskogo natsional'nogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: ekonomicheskaya [Scientific Works of Donetsk National Technical University. Economic Series]. 2014, no. 1, pp. 244—251.
- Gorbatenko A.A. Metody otsenki kachestva gorodskikh territoriy [Methods of Urban Areas Quality Evaluation]. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Stroitel'stvo i arkhitektura [Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series “Engineering and Architecture"]. 2013, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 84—86.
- Sorokina A.F., Mochalova L.A. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovy otsenki kachestva sel'skoy mestnosti [Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of Assessment of Rural Area Quality]. Vestnik UrFU. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie [Proceedings of Ural Federal University. Series: Economy and Management]. 2013, no. 5, pp.103—113.
- Ozhegov S.I. Slovar' russkogo yazyka: Okolo 60 000 slov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazheniy [Russian Dictionary. Approx. 60 000 Words and Phraseological Expressions]. 25th edition. Moscow, Oniks, Mir i obrazovanie Publ., 2008, 976 p.
- Rayzberg B.A., Lozovskiy L.Sh., Stadodubtseva E.B. Sovremennyy ekonomicheskiy slovar' [Modern Dictionary of Economics]. 6-th edition. Moscow, INFRA-M, 2013, 512 p.
- Sabirov I.S., Murafa A.A., Karimova M.A. Otsenka ekonomicheskogo mestopolozheniya v proektakh developmenta [Evaluation of economic development projects in locations]. Izvestiya Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta [News of Kazan State University of Architecture and Engineering]. 2011, no. 2 (16), pp. 295—298.
- Artashina I.A., Zhul'kova Yu.N. Razvitie zemel'nykh otnosheniy kak faktor ekonomicheskikh i sotsial'nykh preobrazovaniy: monografiya [Development of Land Relations as a Factor of Economic and Social Transformations]. N. Novgorod, NNGASU Publ., 2014, 208 p.
- Akhmadieva G.G. Metodicheskie podkhody k otsenke effektivnosti upravleniya razvitiem territoriy [Methodological approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of development management of areas]. Tsentr perspektivnykh ekonomicheskikh issledovaniy Akademii nauk Respubliki Tatarstan [Academy of the Republic of Tatarstan, Center for Advanced Economic Research]. 2011. no. 2, pp. 77—84