SAFETY OF BUILDING SYSTEMS.ECOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. GEOECOLOGY

Problems and prospects of nuclear power plants construction

Vestnik MGSU 2/2014
  • Pergamenshhik Boris Klimentyevich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) Candidate of Technical Sciences, Professor, Department of Thermal and Nuclear Power Plants Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 140-153

60 years ago, in July 1954 in the city of Obninsk near Moscow the world's first nuclear power plant was commissioned with a capacity of 5 MW. Today more than 430 nuclear units with a total capacity of almost 375000 MW are in operation in dozens of the countries worldwide. 72 electrical power units are currently under construction, 8 of them are located in the Russian Federation. There will be no alternative to nuclear energy in the coming decades. Among the factors contributing to the construction of nuclear power plants reckon limited fossil fuel supply, lack of air and primarily carbon dioxide emissions. The holding back factors are breakdown, hazard, radioactive wastes, high construction costs and long construction period. Nuclear accidents in the power plant of «Three-Mile-Island» in the USA, in Chernobyl and in Japan have resulted in termination of construction projects and closure of several nuclear power plants in the Western Europe. The safety systems have become more complex, material consumption and construction costs have significantly increased. The success of modern competing projects like EPR-1600, AP1000, ABWR, national ones AES-2006 and VVER-TOI, as well as several others, depends not only on structural and configuration but also on construction and technological solutions. The increase of the construction term by one year leads to growth of estimated total costs by 3—10 %. The main improvement potentials include external plate reinforcement, pre-fabricated large-block assembly, production and installation of the equipment packages and other. One of the crucial success factors is highly skilled civil engineers training.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2014.2.140-153

References
  1. Vikhrev Yu.V. Atomnaya energetika [Nuclear Energy]. Energetika za rubezhom [Energy Abroad]. 2013, no. 4, pp. 33—38.
  2. Salamov A.A. Novosti energetiki [Energy News]. Energetika za rubezhom [Energy Abroad]. 2012, no. 3, pp. 47—56.
  3. Salamov A.A. Stoimost' PGU s gazifikatsiey uglya [The Cost of Combined Cycle Coal Gasification]. Energetika za rubezhom [Energy Abroad]. 2012, no. 6, pp. 46—52.
  4. Bilozor Ya.S. Avariya na Tri-Mayl-Aylend [Three Mile Island Accident]. Stroitel'stvo AES [Construction of Nuclear Power Plants]. 2010, no. 3 (4), pp. 63—68.
  5. Guskova A.K. Medical Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident: Aftermath and Unsolved Problems. Atomic Energy. 2012, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 135—142. DOI: 10.1007/s10512-012-9607-5.
  6. Guskova A.K. Medical Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident: Aftermath and Unsolved Problems. Atomic Energy. 2012, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 209—213. DOI: 10.1007/s10512-012-9618-2.
  7. Kornienko A.G. Obzor avarii na AES Fukusima-1 v Yaponii. Chast' 1 [Overview of the Accident at Fukushima-1 in Japan. Part 1]. Elektricheskie stantsii [Electric Stations]. 2012, no. 1, pp. 2—15.
  8. Kornienko A.G. Obzor avarii na AES Fukusima-1 v Yaponii. Chast' 2 [Overview of the Accident at Fukushima-1 in Japan. Part 2]. Elektricheskie stantsii [Electric Stations]. 2012, no. 2, pp. 13—28.
  9. Kornienko A.G. Obzor avarii na AES Fukusima-1 v Yaponii. Chast' 3 [Overview of the Accident at Fukushima-1 in Japan. Part 3]. Elektricheskie stantsii [Electric Stations]. 2012, no. 3, pp. 2—8.
  10. Kornienko A.G. Obzor avarii na AES Fukusima-1 v Yaponii. Chast' 4 [Overview of the Accident at Fukushima-1 in Japan. Part 4]. Elektricheskie stantsii [Electric Stations]. 2012, no. 4, pp. 2—8.
  11. Chmielewski A.G. Nuclear Fissile Fuels Worldwide Reserves. Nukleonika. 2008, 53(S2), pp. S11—S14.
  12. Kuznetsov V. Pominki po AES vletyat v kopeechku [Commemorating NPP Costing a Pretty Penny]. Mirovaya energetika [World Power Engineering]. 2005, no. 4, pp. 100—101.
  13. Interesnye TES na gaze — vzglyad zhurnala Power [Interesting Thermal Power Plans on Gas — Overview of Power Magazime]. Energetika za rubezhom [Power Energy Abroad]. 2012, no. 5, pp. 3—5.
  14. Baukin A.V., Ivankova M.A., Koltun O.V., Kroshilin A.E., Pavlov A.S., Stroganov V.B., Temishev R.R. Skol'ko stoit atomnaya energiya [What is the Price for Nuclear Energy]. Energopolis. 2013, no. 1—2 (65—66), pp. 40—43.
  15. Mayanovskiy M.S. Razrabotka i vnedrenie nekotorykh usovershenstvovaniy v yadernoy energetike Yaponii [Development and Implementation of Some Improvements in Nuclear Power in Japan]. Atomnaya tekhnika za rubezhom [Nuclear Engineering Abroad]. 2012, no. 10, pp. 17—26.
  16. Fenik B.S. Opyt sooruzheniya 111 ocheredi AES «Kozloduy» v Narodnoy respublike Bolgarii: obzornaya informatsiya [Experience of Construction Line 111 NPP "Kozloduy" in Bulgaria. Overview]. Moscow, Informenergo Publ., 1990, no. 1, 56 p.

Download

Results 1 - 1 of 1