DESIGNING AND DETAILING OF BUILDING SYSTEMS. MECHANICS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING

The influence of concrete joints on the structural behavior

Vestnik MGSU 3/2014
  • Koyankin Aleksandr Aleksandrovich - Siberian Federal University (SibFU) Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Building Structures and Control Systems, Siberian Federal University (SibFU), 79 Svobodny Avenue, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Beletskaya Valeriya Igorevna - Siberian Federal University (SFU) Master Degree student, Department of Engineering Structures and Controlled Systems, Siberian Federal University (SFU), 79 Svobodnyy Prospekt, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Guzhevskaya Anastasiya Igorevna - Siberian Federal University (SFU) Master Degree student, Department of Engineering Structures and Controlled Systems, Siberian Federal University (SFU), 79 Svobodnyy Prospekt, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 76-81

The buildings made of monolithic reinforced concrete currently enjoy great popularity. Along with a great number of advantages of monolithic building, which are repeatedly listed in the works of many authors, there are many unexplored issues which require detailed consideration. The technological concrete joints are among them. The joints are inevitable in the process of construction of almost any monolithic building and their quality affects the reliability of buildings and structures. Despite regular use of the concept of cold joint and clear instructions in building standards on the technology of joint production, most organizations do not follow the correct technology of concreting the elements. As a result, the strength and stiffness characteristics of the construction deteriorate, because the linkage value of new concrete with the old one is significantly lower than in monolith. In order to conduct experimental studies the reinforced concrete beams of rectangular section were produced. As a result of testing, it was determined that the presence of a concrete joint significantly reduces the stiffness and carrying capacity of the structures. It is confirmed by the fact that the received deflections of solid beams without joint are significantly lower than the deflections of beams with cold joint. It also noted that the deflections of the beams manufactured following the normative technology are lower, than the deflections of the beams, manufactured with violation of the rules. Basing on the obtained results, it was concluded, that more detailed study of the work of a construction with cold joints in concrete is required. The reason for it is in the changing for the worse of the strength and stiffness characteristics of structural element, which is made produced with a joint, while in the process of real designing, the monolith buildings are calculated as solid monolithic, without joints.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2014.3.76-81

References
  1. Sokolov M.E. Rekomendatsii po ratsional'nomu primeneniyu konstruktsiy iz monolitnogo betona dlya zhilykh i obshchestvennykh zdaniy [Recommendations for Rational Use of the Structures Made of Monolithic Concrete for Residential and Public Buildings]. Moscow, TsNIIEPzh Publ., 1983.
  2. Sigalov E.E., Protasov V.A. K opredeleniyu osrednennoy zhestkosti zhelezobetonnykh vnetsentrenno szhatykh stoek s uchetom treshchin v rastyanutykh zonakh [On the Rigidity Determination of Reinforced Concrete Off-centre Compressed Columns]. Beton i zhelezobeton [Concrete and Reinforced Concrete]. 1971, no. 2, pp. 34—36.
  3. Popova M.V. Nesushchaya sposobnost' i deformativnost' monolitnykh plit perekrytiy s uchetom obrazovaniya tekhnologicheskikh treshchin [Bearing Capacity and Deformability of Monolithic Floor Slabs with Account for Technological Cracks Formation]. Moscow, 2002, 186 p.
  4. Spaethe G. Die Siclierhcit tragender Baukonstruktionen. 1992, Springer Aufl age, 306 p.
  5. Eisenberger M., Bielak J. Finite Beams on Infi nite Two-parameter Elastic Foundations. Computers & Structures. 1992, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 661—664. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(92)90133-K.
  6. Sokolov M.E. Issledovanie treshchinoobrazovaniya v monolitnykh zdaniyakh [Crack Formation Study in Monolithic Buildings]. Zhilishchnoe stroitel'stvo [Housing Construction]. 1978, no. 8, pp. 11—16.
  7. Gvozdev A.A. Treshchinostoykost' i deformativnost' obychnykh i predvaritel'no napryazhennykh zhelezobetonnykh konstruktsiy [Crack Resistance and Deformability of Usual and Prestressed Concrete Structures]. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1965.
  8. Gushcha Yu.P. Issledovanie shiriny raskrytiya normal'nykh treshchin [Width Study of Normal Cracks]. Prochnost' i zhestkost' zhelezobetonnykh konstruktsiy [Durability and Rigidity of Reinforced Concrete Structures]. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1971.
  9. Karpenko N.I. K postroeniyu obshchikh kriteriev deformirovaniya i razrusheniya zhelezobetonnykh elementov [On the Question of Developing General Criteria of Deformation and Destruction of Reinforced Concrete Elements]. Beton i zhelezobeton [Concrete and Reinforced Concrete]. 2002, no. 6, pp. 20—25.
  10. Razaqpur A., Shah K. Exact Analysis of Beams on Two-parameter Elastic Foundations. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 1991, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 435—454. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(91)90133-Z.
  11. Pishchulev A.A. Sovershenstvovanie rascheta prochnosti normal'nykh secheniy izgibaemykh zhelezobetonnykh konstruktsiy s povrezhdennoy szhatoy zonoy betona [Improvement of Strength Calculation of the Normal Sections of Bending Reinforced Concrete Structures with the Damaged Compressed Concrete Area]. Samara, 2010, 192 p.
  12. Korenev B.G. Voprosy rascheta balok i plit na uprugom osnovanii [Questions of the Calculation of Beams and Slabs on Elastic Foundation]. Moscow, Gosstroyizdat Publ., 1954, 231 p.

Download

CAST-IN-PLACE BUILDING FRAME AND ITS FEATURES AT SEPARATE LIFE CYCLES

Vestnik MGSU 9/2015
  • Koyankin Aleksandr Aleksandrovich - Siberian Federal University (SibFU) Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Building Structures and Control Systems, Siberian Federal University (SibFU), 79 Svobodny Avenue, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Mitasov Valeriy Mikhaylovich - Novosibirsk State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (Sibstrin) (FGBOU VPO NGASU) Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, chair, Department of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Novosibirsk State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (Sibstrin) (FGBOU VPO NGASU), 113 Leningradskaya str., Novosibirsk, 630008, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 28-35

Modern intensive development of precast-cast-in-place construction has led to creation of a wide range of various constructive systems of buildings during the last 100 years. They allow constructing buildings with best account of the requirements of functionality, architectural expressiveness, production possibilities of construction companies, etc. However in spite of this development both precast and cast-in-place housing construction has its peculiarities, positive and negative ones. The constructive systems of precast monolithic buildings existing at the moment are based on the required mutual deformation of prefabricated reinforced and cast iron reinforced concrete at the stage of a building construction and at the stage of its use as well. Having refused from this rule, the authors of this article have introduced a constructive system of a precast monolithic building able to bear loads, developing at the stage of erection (due to completion of a precast frame) and at the stage of use (due to completion of a precast monolithic frame). The offered construction of a precast monolithic building frame allows efficiently using the advantages of precast and cast-in-place construction minimizing their disadvantages and it also fully corresponds to the obligatory requirements to buildings. The corresponding patents are obtained.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2015.9.28-35

References
  1. Mordich A.I., Belevich V.N., Simbirkin V.N., Navoy D.I., Mironov A.N., Raychev V.P., Chubrik A.I. Effektivnye konstruktivnye sistemy mnogoetazhnykh zhilykh domov i obshchestvennykh zdaniy (12…25 etazhey) dlya usloviy stroitel’stva v Moskve i gorodakh Moskovskoy oblasti, naibolee polno udovletvoryayushchie sovremennym marketingovym trebovaniyam [Effective Constructional Systems of Multistory Blocks of Flats and Civil Buildings (12…25 Storey) for the Construction Conditions in Moscow and the Cities of Moscow Region, More Fully Fulfilling Modern Marketing Demands]. Minsk, NIEPUP “Institut BelNIIS” Publ., 2002, 117 p. (In Russian)
  2. Unifitsirovannaya sistema sborno-monolitnogo bezrigel’nogo karkasa KUB 2.5. Vypusk 1-1 / TsNIIPI «Monolit» [Unified System of Precast-Cast-in-place Reinforced Concrete Composite Frame without Collar Beams KUB 2.5. Edition 1-1 / TSNIIPI “Monolit”]. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1990, 49 p. (In Russian)
  3. Shembakov V.A. Sborno-monolitnoe karkasnoe domostroenie: rukovodstvo k prinyatiyu resheniya [Cast-in place and Precast Frame House-Building. Guidance for Decision-Making]. 2-nd edition, revised. Cheboksary, OOO “Cheboksarskaya tipografiya № 1” Publ., 2005, 119 p. (In Russian)
  4. Mitasov V.M., Koyankin A.A. Rabota diska sborno-monolitnogo perekrytiya [Operation of a Precast Monolithic Slab]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Stroitel’stvo [News of Higher Educational Institutions. Construction]. 2014, no. 3, pp. 103—109. (In Russian)
  5. Nikitin N.V., Franov P.I., Timonin E.M. Rekomendatsii po proektirovaniyu konstruktsiy ploskogo sborno-monolitnogo perekrytiya «Sochi» [Recommendations for Engineering of the Constructions of Flat Precast Monolithic Slab “Sochi”]. 3-rd edition, revised. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1975, 34 p. (In Russian)
  6. Koyankin A.A., Mitasov V.M. Eksperimental’nye issledovaniya raboty stykovogo soedineniya rigelya s kolonnoy v sborno-monolitnom perekrytii [Experimental Study of the Operation of the Bolt Joint of a Bearer with a Column in Precast-Monolithic Ceiling]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2015, no. 5, pp. 27—34. (In Russian)
  7. Sakhnovskiy K.V. Zhelezobetonnye konstruktsii [Reinforced Concrete Constructions]. 8th edition. Moscow, Gosstroyizdat Publ., 1960, 840 p. (In Russian)
  8. Mordich A.I. Sborno-monolitnye i monolitnye karkasy mnogoetazhnykh zdaniy s ploskimi raspornymi perekrytiyami [Precast-Monolithic and Monolithic Frames of Multistoreyed Buildings with Flat Brace Floor]. Montazhnye i spetsial’nye raboty v stroitel’stve [Building and Special Works in Construction]. 2001, no. 8—9, pp. 10—14. (In Russian)
  9. Mordich A.I. Belevich V.N., Simbirkin V.N., Navoy D.I. Opyt prakticheskogo primeneniya i osnovnye rezul’taty naturnykh ispytaniy sborno-monolitnogo karkasa BelNIIS [Experience of Practical Application and the Main Results of Field Studies of the Precast-Monolithic Frame BelNIIS]. BST: Byulleten’ stroitel’noy tekhniki [BST: Bulletin of Construction Technologies]. 2004, no. 8, pp. 8—12. (In Russian)
  10. Mordich A.I., Sadokho V.E., Podlipskaya I.I., Taratynova N.A. Sborno-monolitnye prednapryazhennye perekrytiya s primeneniem mnogopustotnykh plit [Precast-Monolithic Prestressed Slabs Using Hollow Core Slabs]. Beton i zhelezobeton [Concrete and Reinforced Concrete]. 1993, no. 5, pp. 3—6. (In Russian)
  11. Weber H., Bredenbals B., Hullman H. Bauelemente mit Gittertragern. Institut fur Industrialisierung des Buens. Hannover, 1996, 24 p.
  12. Dimitrijevic R. A Prestressed «Open» System from Jugoslavia. Système «ouvert» précontraint yougoslave. Batiment Informational, Building Research and Practice. 1978, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 244, 245—249. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy referativnyy sbornik TsINIS [Science and Technical Abstract Collection of the Central Institute of Scientific Information on Construction]. 1979, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 8—12.
  13. Bausysteme mit Gittertragern. Fachgruppe Betonbauteile mit Gittertragern im BDB. Bonn, 1998, 40 p.
  14. Schwerm D., Jaurini G. Deskensysteme aus Betonfertigteilen. Informationsstelle Beton-Bauteile, 1997, Bonn, 37 p.
  15. Pessiki S., Prior R., Sause R., Slaughter S. Review of Existing Precast Concrete Gravity Load Floor Framing System. PCI Journal. 1995, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 52—67.
  16. Koprivitsa B. Primenenie karkasnoy sistemy IMS dlya stroitel’stva zhilykh i obshchestvennykh zdaniy [Application of Frame System IMS for Constructing Residentialand Public Buildings]. Zhilishchnoe stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 1984, no. 1, pp. 30—32. (In Russian)
  17. Semchenkov A.S. Obosnovanie regional’no-adaptirovannye industrial’noy universal’noy stroitel’noy sistemy «RADIUSS» [Reasons of Regional-Adaptive Industrial Universal Construction System “RADIUSS”]. Beton i zhelezobeton [Concrete and Reinforced Concrete]. 2008, no. 4, pp. 1—7. (In Russian)
  18. Semchenkov A.S. Regional’no-adaptiruemye sborno-monolitnye stroitel’nye sistemy dlya mnogoetazhnykh zdaniy [Regional-Adaptive Precast-Cast-in-place Constructional Systems for Multi-Storied Buildings]. Beton i zhelezobeton [Concrete and Reinforced Concrete]. 2010, no. 3, pp. 2—6. (In Russian)
  19. Kimberg A.M. Effektivnaya konstruktivnaya sistema karkasno-panel’nykh zdaniy s natyazheniem armatury v postroechnykh usloviyakh (metodicheskie rekomendatsii) [Effective Constructive System of Frame-Panel Buildings with Tensioning of the Steel in Site Conditions (Methodological Recommendations)]. Tbilisi, TbilZNIIEP Publ., 1985, 33 p. (In Russian)
  20. Kazina G.A. Sovremennye zhelezobetonnye konstruktsii seysmostoykikh zdaniy [Modern Reinforced Concrete Structures of Earthquake-Resistant Buildings]. Moscow, VNIIS Publ., 1981, 25 p. (In Russian)

Download

Experimental study of the operation of the bolt joint of a bearerwith a column in precast-monolithic ceiling

Vestnik MGSU 5/2015
  • Koyankin Aleksandr Aleksandrovich - Siberian Federal University (SibFU) Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Building Structures and Control Systems, Siberian Federal University (SibFU), 79 Svobodny Avenue, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Mitasov Valeriy Mikhaylovich - Novosibirsk State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (Sibstrin) (FGBOU VPO NGASU) Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, chair, Department of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Novosibirsk State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (Sibstrin) (FGBOU VPO NGASU), 113 Leningradskaya str., Novosibirsk, 630008, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 27-35

Precast-monolithic construction is becoming an increasingly popular form of housing. The wide distribution of this type of construction is explained by the possibility to successfully combine the advantages of precast and monolithic construction, at the same time reducing their disadvantages. Though there is a significant lack of data, including experimental data, for objective assessment of the stress-strain state of precast-monolithic floor structures. In order to investigate the structural reliability of the bolt joint of a bearer with a column in a precast-monolithic building a series of experimental investigations were carried out in the laboratory of testing the building structures of the Siberian Federal University.One of the main conclusions is that the bolt joint of a bearer with a column is characterized by sufficient rigidity, crack resistance and bearing capacity. The results of the given work have proved the data obtained in previously conducted investigations on a fragment of a precast-monolithic ceiling.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2015.5.27-35

References
  1. Mordich A.I., Belevich V.N., Simbirkin V.N., Navoy D.I., Mironov A.N., Raychev V.P., Chubrik A.I. Effektivnye konstruktivnye sistemy mnogoetazhnykh zhilykh domov i obshchestvennykh zdaniy (12…25 etazhey) dlya usloviy stroitel’stva v Moskve i gorodakh Moskovskoy oblasti, naibolee polno udovletvoryayushchie sovremennym marketingovym trebovaniyam [Efficient Structural Systems of Multi-Storey Residential Buildings and Public Buildings (12...25 floors) for Construction in Moscow and the Moscow Region Cities, which Best Meet Modern Marketing Requirements]. Minsk, NIEPUP «Institut BelNIIS» Publ., 2002, 117 p. (In Russian)
  2. Shembakov V.A. Sborno-monolitnoe karkasnoe domostroenie: rukovodstvo k prinyatiyu resheniya [Precast-Monolithic Frame Construction. A Guide to Making Decisions]. 2nd edition. Cheboksary, 2005, 119 p. (In Russian)
  3. Unifitsirovannaya sistema sborno-monolitnogo bezrigel’nogo karkasa KUB 2.5. Vypusk 1-1 [Unified System of Precast-Monolithic Girderless Frame KUB 2.5. Issue 1-1]. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1990, 49 p. (In Russian)
  4. Nikitin N.V., Franov P.I., Timonin E.M. Rekomendatsii po proektirovaniyu konstruktsiy ploskogo sborno-monolitnogo perekrytiya «Sochi» [Recommendations for structural design of flat precast-monolithic slabs “Sochi”]. 3rd edition, revised and enlarged. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1975, 34 p. (In Russian)
  5. Kazina G.A. Sovremennye zhelezobetonnye konstruktsii seysmostoykikh zdaniy [Modern Reinforced Concrete Structures of Earthquake-Resistant Buildings]. Moscow, VNIIS Publ., 1981, 25 p. (In Russian)
  6. Selivanov V.N., Selivanov S.N. Patent. 2107784 RF, MPK E04G23, E04G21, E04B1/35. Sposob vozvedeniya, vosstanovleniya ili rekonstruktsii zdaniy, sooruzheniy i sposob izgotovleniya stroitel’nykh izdeliy i konstruktsiy iz kompozitsionnykh materialov, preimushchestvenno betonov, dlya vozvedeniya, vosstanovleniya ili rekonstruktsii zdaniy, sooruzheniy [Russian Patent 2107784 RF, MPK E04G23, E04G21, E04B1/35. Method of Constructing, Repair or Reconstruction of Buildings, Structures and Method of Producing Building Products and Structures of Composite Materials]. Zayavka № 96124582/03; zayavl. 30.12.1996; opubl. 27.03.1998 [Notice no. 96124582/03; appl. 30.12.1996; publ. 27.03.1998]. (In Russian)
  7. Mordich A.I., Kuchikhin S.N., Belevich V.N., Simbirkin V.N. Patent 2226593 RF, MPK E04B1/18. Zhelezobetonnyy sborno-monolitnyy karkas mnogoetazhnogo zdaniya [Russian Patent 2226593 RF, MPK E04B1/18. Reinforced Concrete Precast-Monolithic Frame of a Multistoreyed Building]. Zayavka № 2002118292/03; zayavl. 08.07.2002; opubl. 10.04.2004 [Notice no. 2002118292/03; appl. 08.07.2002; publ. 10.04.2004]. Patent holder “Institut BelNIIS”. (In Russian)
  8. Mustafin I.I. Patent 2281362 RF, MPK E04B1/20. Sborno-monolitnyy zhelezobetonnyy karkas mnogoetazhnogo zdaniya «Kazan’-XXIv» [Russian Patent 2281362 RF, MPK E04B1/20. Precast-Monolithic Reinforced Concrete Frame of a Multistoreyed Building “Kazan-21 c.”]. Zayavka № 2004139244/03; zayavl. 27.12.2004; opubl. 10.08.2006. Byul. № 22 [Notice no. 2004139244/03; appl. 27.12.2004; publ. 10.08.2006. Bulletin no. 22]. 14 p. (In Russian)
  9. Mordich A.I. Sborno-monolitnye i monolitnye karkasy mnogoetazhnykh zdaniy s ploskimi raspornymi perekrytiyami [Precast-Monolithic and Monolithic Frames of Multistoreyed Buildings with Flat Brace Floor]. Montazhnye i spetsial’nye raboty v stroitel’stve [Building and Special Works in Construction]. 2001, no. 8—9, pp. 10—14.
  10. Sakhnovskiy K.V. Zhelezobetonnye konstruktsii [Reinforced Concrete Constructions]. 8th edition. Moscow, Gosstroyizdat Publ., 1960, 840 p. (In Russian)
  11. Mordich A.I. Belevich V.N., Simbirkin V.N., Navoy D.I. Opyt prakticheskogo primeneniya i osnovnye rezul’taty naturnykh ispytaniy sborno-monolitnogo karkasa BelNIIS [Experience of Practical Application and the Main Results of Field Studies of the Precast-Monolithic Frame BelNIIS]. BST: Byulleten’ stroitel’noy tekhniki [BST: Bulletin of Construction Technologies]. 2004, no. 8, pp. 8—12. (In Russian)
  12. Koprivitsa B. Primenenie karkasnoy sistemy IMS dlya stroitel’stva zhilykh i obshchestvennykh zdaniy [Application of Frame System IMS for Constructing Residentialand Public Buildings]. Zhilishchnoe stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 1984, no. 1, pp. 30—32. (In Russian)
  13. Mordich A.I., Sadokho V.E., Podlipskaya I.I., Taratynova N.A. Sborno-monolitnye prednapryazhennye perekrytiya s primeneniem mnogopustotnykh plit [Precast-Monolithic Prestressed Slabs Using Hollow Core Slabs]. Beton i zhelezobeton [Concrete and Reinforced Concrete]. 1993, no. 5, pp. 3—6. (In Russian)
  14. Weber H., Bredenbals B., Hullman H. Bauelemente mit Gittertragern. Institut fur Industrialisierung des Buens. Hannover, 1996, 24 p.
  15. Bausysteme mit Gittertragern. Fachgruppe Betonbauteile mit Gittertragern im BDB. Bonn, 1998, 40 p.
  16. Janti F. Sborno-monolitnyy karkas «Delta» [Precast-Monolithic Frame “Delta”]. Prospekt kompanii «Deltatek OY» [Circular of the Company “Deltatek OY”]. 1998, 6 p. (In Russian)
  17. Dimitrijevic R. A Prestressed «Open» System from Jugoslavia. Système «ouvert» précontraint yougoslave. Batiment Informational, Building Research and Practice. 1978, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 244, 245—249. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy referativnyy sbornik TsINIS [Science and Technical Abstract Collection of the Central Institute of Scientific Information on Construction]. 1979, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 8—12.
  18. Pessiki S., Prior R., Sause R., Slaughter S. Review of Existing Precast Concrete Gravity Load Floor Framing System. PCI Journal. 1995, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 52—67.
  19. Schwerm D., Jaurini G. Deskensysteme aus Betonfertigteilen. Informationsstelle Beton-Bauteile. Bonn, 1997, 37 p.
  20. Mitasov V.M., Koyankin A.A. Rabota diska sborno-monolitnogo perekrytiya [Operation of a Floor Slab of a Precast-Monolithic Floor]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Stroitel’stvo [News of Higher Educational Institutions. Construction]. 2014, no. 3, pp. 103—110. (In Russian)

Download

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH OF THE JOINS OF A HOLLOW SLAB WITH PRECAST-CAST-IN-PLACE AND MONOLITHIC GIRDER

Vestnik MGSU 10/2015
  • Koyankin Aleksandr Aleksandrovich - Siberian Federal University (SibFU) Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Building Structures and Control Systems, Siberian Federal University (SibFU), 79 Svobodny Avenue, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian Federation.
  • Mitasov Valeriy Mikhaylovich - Novosibirsk State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (Sibstrin) (FGBOU VPO NGASU (Sibstrin)) Doctor of Technical Sciences, chair, Department of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Novosibirsk State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (Sibstrin) (FGBOU VPO NGASU (Sibstrin)), 113 Leningradskaya str., Novosibirsk, 630008, Russian Federation.

Pages 32-39

The contemporary precast-cast-in-place housing construction has become widely used on the territory of Russia. A great amount of big construction companies begin using the technology of precast and cast-in-place housing construction as the main one. This fact is proving the convenience of reinforced precast and cast-in-place concrete for the buildings of various functions in the climatic conditions of our country. Though there is a lack of investigations of such constructions though they are increasingly developing. Due to the lack of experimental research data existing at the moment, which allow estimating deformed condition of precast-cast-in-place constructions of slabs objectively, experimental research of hollow slab longitudinal beam with precast-cast-in-place and cast-in-place joist was carried out by the authors. The results of the given work prove the data previously obtained by the authors in their experiments using a fragment of precast-cast-in-place slab.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2015.10.32-39

References
  1. Mitasov V.M., Koyankin A.A. Rabota diska sborno-monolitnogo perekrytiya [Operation of a slab of cast over precast joists]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Stroitel’stvo [News of Higher Educational Institutions. Construction]. 2014, no. 3 (663), pp. 103—119. (In Russian)
  2. Koyankin A.A., Mitasov V.M. Eksperimental’nye issledovaniya raboty stykovogo soedineniya rigelya s kolonnoy v sborno-monolitnom perekrytii [Experimental Study of the Operation of the Bolt Joint of a Bearer with a Column in Precast-Monolithic Ceiling]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2015, no. 5, pp. 27—34. (In Russian)
  3. Unifitsirovannaya sistema sborno-monolitnogo bezrigel’nogo karkasa KUB 2.5. Vypusk 1-1 [Unified System of Precast-Cast-in-Place Reinforced Concrete Composite Frame Without Collar Beams KUB 2.5. Edition 1-1]. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1990, 49 p. (In Russian)
  4. Shembakov V.A. Sborno-monolitnoe karkasnoe domostroenie. Rukovodstvo k prinyatiyu resheniya [Cast-in Place and Precast Frame House-Building. Guidance for Decision-Making]. 2nd edition, revised. Cheboksary, OOO “Cheboksarskaya tipografiya № 1” Publ., 2005, 119 p. (In Russian)
  5. Mordich A.I., Belevich V.N., Simbirkin V.N., Navoy D.I., Mironov A.N., Raychev V.P., Chubrik A.I. Effektivnye konstruktivnye sistemy mnogoetazhnykh zhilykh domov i obshchestvennykh zdaniy (12…25 etazhey) dlya usloviy stroitel’stva v Moskve i gorodakh Moskovskoy oblasti, naibolee polno udovletvoryayushchie sovremennym marketingovym trebovaniyam [Effective Structural Systems of Multistory Blocks of Flats and Civil Buildings (12…25 Stories) for Construction Conditions in Moscow and the Cities of Moscow Region, Fulfilling Modern Marketing Demands More Completely]. Minsk, NIEPUP «Institut BelNIIS» Publ., 2002, 117 p. (In Russian)
  6. Nikitin N.V., Franov P.I., Timonin E.M. Rekomendatsii po proektirovaniyu konstruktsiy ploskogo sborno-monolitnogo perekrytiya «Sochi» [Recommendations for Engineering Constructions of a Flat Precast-Cast-In-Place Slab “Sochi”]. 3rd edition, revised. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1975, 34 p. (In Russian)
  7. Sakhnovskiy K.V. Zhelezobetonnye konstruktsii [Reinforced Concrete Structures]. 8th edition, revised. Moscow, Gosstroyizdat Publ., 1959, 840 p. (In Russian)
  8. Mordich A.I., Belevich V.N., Simbirkin V.N., Navoy D.I. Opyt prakticheskogo primeneniya i osnovnye rezul’taty naturnykh ispytaniy sborno-monolitnogo karkasa BelNIIS [Experience of Practical Use and Main Results of In-Place Tests of Precast and Cast-In-Place Frame BelNIIS]. BST: Byulleten’ stroitel’noy tekhniki [BST — Bulletin of Construction Equipment]. 2004, no. 8, pp. 8—12. (In Russian)
  9. Mordich A.I. Sborno-monolitnye i monolitnye karkasy mnogoetazhnykh zdaniy s ploskimi raspornymi perekrytiyami [In-cast and Precast Joists and Cast-In-Place Frames of Multi-Storey Buildings with Flat Space Slabs]. Montazhnye i spetsial’nye raboty v stroitel’stve [Erecting and Special Works in Construction]. 2001, no. 8—9, pp. 10—14. (In Russian)
  10. Mordich A.I., Sadokho V.E., Podlipskaya I.I., Taratynova N.A. Sborno-monolitnye prednapryazhennye perekrytiya s primeneniem mnogopustotnykh plit [In-cast and Precast Joists Stressed Slabs with Use of Hollow-Core Slab]. Beton i zhelezobeton [Concrete and Reinforced Concrete]. 1993, no. 5, pp. 3—6. (In Russian)
  11. Semchenkov A.S. Obosnovanie regional’no-adaptiruemoy industrial’noy universal’noy stroitel’noy sistemy «RADIUSS» [Justification of regional-adaptive industrial universal construction system “RADIUSS”]. Beton i zhelezobeton [Concrete and Reinforced Concrete]. 2008, no. 4, pp. 2—6. (In Russian)
  12. Koprivitsa B. Primenenie karkasnoy sistemy IMS dlya stroitel’stva zhilykh i obshchestvennykh zdaniy [The Use of Frame System IMS for Construction of Residential and Industrial Buildings]. Zhilishchnoe stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 1984, no. 1, pp. 30—32. (In Russian)
  13. Semchenkov A.S. Regional’no-adaptiruemye sborno-monolitnye stroitel’nye sistemy dlya mnogoetazhnykh zdaniy [Regional-Adaptive Precast-Cast-In-Place Constructional Systems for Multi-Storied Buildings]. Beton i zhelezobeton [Concrete and Reinforced Concrete]. 2010, no. 6, pp. 2—6. (In Russian)
  14. Kazina G.A. Sovremennye seysmostoykie konstruktsii zhelezobetonnykh zdaniy [Modern Earthquake-Resistant Constructions of Reinforced Concrete Buildings]. Moscow, VNIIIS Publ., 1981, 75 p. (In Russian)
  15. Kimberg A.M. Effektivnaya konstruktivnaya sistema karkasno-panel’nykh zdaniy s natyazheniem armatury v postroechnykh usloviyakh (metodicheskie rekomendatsii) [Effective Constructive System of Frame-Panel Buildings with Tensioning of the Steel in Site Conditions (Methodological Recommendations)]. Tbilisi, TbilZNIIEP Publ., 1985, 33 p. (In Russian)
  16. Weber H., Bredenbals B., Hullman H. Bauelemente mit Gittertragern. Institut fur Industrialisierung des Buens. Hannover, 1996, 24 p.
  17. Dimitrijevic R. A Prestressed “Open” System from Jugoslavia. Système «Ouvert» Précontraint Yougoslave. Batiment Informational, Building Research and Practice. 1978, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 244, 245—249. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy referativnyy sbornik TsINIS [Science and Technical Abstract Collection of the Central Institute of Scientific Information on Construction]. 1979, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 8—12.
  18. Bausysteme mit Gittertragern. Fachgruppe Betonbauteile mit Gittertragern im BDB. Bonn, 1998, 40 p.
  19. Schwerm D., Jaurini G. Deskensysteme aus Betonfertigteilen. Informationsstelle Beton-Bauteile. Bonn, 1997, 37 p.
  20. Pessiki S., Prior R., Sause R., Slaughter S. Review of Existing Precast Concrete Gravity Load Floor Framing System. PCI Journal. 1995, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 52—67.

Download

Comparative analysis of the results of experimental and numerical studies of the performance of cross-beam butt joint with a column in slab cast over precast joists

Vestnik MGSU 12/2015
  • Koyankin Aleksandr Aleksandrovich - Siberian Federal University (SibFU) Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Building Structures and Control Systems, Siberian Federal University (SibFU), 79 Svobodny Avenue, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian Federation.
  • Kolcheva Natal’ya Viktorovna - Siberian Federal University (FGOU VPO SFU) Master student, Department of Building Structures and Control Systems, Siberian Federal University (FGOU VPO SFU), 79 Svobodny Avenue, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian Federation.

Pages 59-65

At the present moment in Russia the construction of precast and cast-in-place frame buildings are widely spread in Russia. This technology is the most advanced because of the possibility of maximally efficient simultaneous use of the advantages of precast and monolithic housing construction with minimizing their disadvantages. At the same time the volume of the scientific researches on stress-strain state of cast-in-place and precast constructions is not enough to objectively evaluate the bearing capacity, rigidity and crack-resistance of such buildings. Cast-in-place and precast construction covers a considerable part in large-scale construction, but despite this, there is a great variety of gaps in the understanding of such construction performance. Reasoning from this fact, numerical and experimental research has been carried out on studying of the performance of longitudinal beam joint to column with a column in slab cast over precast joists.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2015.12.59-65

References
  1. Shembakov V.A. Sborno-monolitnoe karkasnoe domostroenie: rukovodstvo k prinyatiyu resheniya [Cast-in place and Precast Frame House-Building. Guidance for Decision-Making]. 2nd edition, revised. Cheboksary, 2005, 119 p. (In Russian)
  2. Unifitsirovannaya sistema sborno-monolitnogo bezrigel’nogo karkasa KUB 2.5. Vypusk 1-1 / TsNIIPI «Monolit» [Unified System of Precast-Cast-in-place Reinforced Concrete Composite Frame without Collar Beams KUB 2.5. Edition 1-1 / TSNIIPI “Monolit”]. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1990, 49 p. (In Russian)
  3. Selivanov V.N., Selivanov S.N. Patent 2107784 RU, MPK E04V 1/35, E04G 23/00, E04G 21/00. Sposob vozvedeniya, vosstanovleniya ili rekonstruktsii zdaniy, sooruzheniy i sposob izgotovleniya stroitel’nykh izdeliy i konstruktsiy iz kompozitsionnykh materialov, preimushchestvenno betonov, dlya vozvedeniya, vosstanovleniya ili rekonstruktsii zdaniy, sooruzheniy [Russian Patent 2107784 RU, MPK E04V 1/35, E04G 23/00, E04G 21/00. Ways of Construction, Reconstruction and Restoration of Buildings, Structures and Method of Construction Products of Composite Materials, Primarily of Concrete, for Construction, Reconstruction and Restoration of Buildings, Structures]. Patent holder V.N. Selivanov, S.N. Selivanov. No. 96124582/03 ; appl. 30.12.1996 ; publ. 27.03.1998. (In Russian)
  4. Mordich A.I., Sadokho V.E., Podlipskaya I.I., Taratynova N.A. Sborno-monolitnye prednapryazhennye perekrytiya s primeneniem mnogopustotnykh plit [Precast-Monolithic Prestressed Slabs Using Hollow Core Slabs]. Beton i zhelezobeton [Concrete and Reinforced Concrete]. 1993, no. 5, pp. 3—6. (In Russian)
  5. Mordich A.I., Kuchikhin S.N., Belevich V.N., Simbirkin V.N. Patent 2226593 RU, MPK E04V 1/18. Zhelezobetonnyy sborno-monolitnyy karkas mnogoetazhnogo zdaniya [Russian Patent 2226593 RU, MPK E04V 1/18Reinforced Concrete Precast-Cast-In-Place Frame of a Multistorey Building]. Patent holder Institute «BelNIIS». No. 2002118292/03 ; appl. 08.07.2002 ; publ. 10.04.2004. Byul. no. 10. (In Russian)
  6. Mustafin I.I. Patent 2281362 RU, MPK E04V 1/20. Sborno-monolitnyy zhelezobetonnyy karkas mnogoetazhnogo zdaniya «Kazan’-XXIv» [Russian Patent 2281362 RU, MPK E04V 1/20. Precast-Cast-In-Place Reinforced Concrete Frame of a Multistory Building “Kazan-21v”]. Patent holder I.I. Mustafin. No. 2004139244/03 ; appl. 27.12.2004 ; publ. 10.05.2005. Bulletin no. 22. (In Russian)
  7. Kazina G.A. Sovremennye zhelezobetonnye konstruktsii seysmostoykikh zdaniy: otechestvennyy i zarubezhnyy opyt [Modern Reinforced Concrete Structures of Earthquake-Resistant Buildings : Domestic and Foreign Experience]. Moscow, VNIIS Publ., 1981, 25 p. (Construction and Architecture. Series 8. Building Structures) (In Russian)
  8. Mordich A.I. Sborno-monolitnye i monolitnye karkasy mnogoetazhnykh zdaniy s ploskimi raspornymi perekrytiyami [In-cast and Precast Joists and Cast-In-Place Frames of Multi-Storey Buildings with Flat Space Slabs]. Montazhnye i spetsial’nye raboty v stroitel’stve [Erecting and Special Works in Construction]. 2001, no. 8—9, pp. 10—14. (In Russian)
  9. Koyankin A.A., Mitasov V.M. Nekotorye rezul’taty naturnykh ispytaniy fragmenta karkasnogo zdaniya v sborno-monolitnom ispolnenii [Some Results of Field Investigations of a Fragment of Precast-Cast-In-Place Frame Building]. Beton i zhelezobeton [Concrete and Reinforced Concrete]. 2015, no. 5, pp. 18—20. (In Russian)
  10. Mordich A.I., Belevich V.N., Simbirkin V.N., Navoy D.I. Opyt prakticheskogo primeneniya i osnovnye rezul’taty naturnykh ispytaniy sborno-monolitnogo karkasa BelNIIS [Experience of Practical Use and Main Results of In-Place Tests of Precast and Cast-In-Place Frame BelNIIS]. BST: Byulleten’ stroitel’noy tekhniki [BST — Bulletin of Construction Equipment]. 2004, no. 8, pp. 8—12. (In Russian)
  11. Koprivitsa B. Primenenie karkasnoy sistemy IMS dlya stroitel’stva zhilykh i obshchestvennykh zdaniy [The Use of Frame System IMS for Construction of Residential and Industrial Buildings]. Zhilishchnoe stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 1984, no. 1, pp. 30—32. (In Russian)
  12. Mordich A.I., Sadokho V.E., Podlipskaya I.I., Taratynova N.A. Sborno-monolitnye prednapryazhennye perekrytiya s primeneniem mnogopustotnykh plit [In-cast and Precast Joists Stressed Slabs with Use of Hollow-Core Slab]. Beton i zhelezobeton [Concrete and Reinforced Concrete]. 1993, no. 5, pp. 3—6. (In Russian)
  13. Weber H., Bredenbals B., Hullman H. Bauelemente mit Gittertragern. Hannover, Institut fur Industrialisierung des Buens, 1996, 24 p.
  14. Bausysteme mit Gittertragern. Fachgruppe Betonbauteile mit Gittertragern im BDB. Bonn, 1998, 40 p.
  15. Janti F. Sborno-monolitnyy karkas «Delta» [Precast-cast-in-place frame “Delta”] Prospekt kompanii «Deltatek OY». Prospectus of the Company “Deltatek OY”]. 1998, 6 p.
  16. Dimitrijevic R. A Prestressed «Open» System from Jugoslavia. Système «Ouvert» Précontraint Yougoslave. Batiment Informational, Building Research and Practice. 1978, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 244, 245—249. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy referativnyy sbornik TsINIS [Science and Technical Abstract Collection of the Central Institute of Scientific Information on Construction]. 1979, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 8—12. (In Russian)
  17. Pessiki S., Prior R., Sause R., Slaughter S. Review of Existing Precast Concrete Gravity Load Floor Framing System. PCI Journal. 1995, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 52—67.
  18. Schwerm D., Jaurini G. Deskensysteme aus Betonfertigteilen. Informationsstelle Beton-Bauteile, Bonn, 1997, 37 p.
  19. Koyankin A.A., Mitasov V.M. Eksperimental’nye issledovaniya raboty stykovogo soedineniya rigelya s kolonnoy v sborno-monolitnom perekrytii [Experimental Study of the Operation of the Bolt Joint of a Bearer with a Column in Precast-Monolithic Ceiling]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2015, no. 5, pp. 27—34. (In Russian)
  20. Mitasov V.M., Koyankin A.A. Rabota diska sborno-monolitnogo perekrytiya [Operation of a slab of cast over precast joists]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Stroitel’stvo [News of Higher Educational Institutions. Construction]. 2014, no. 3, pp. 103—110. (In Russian)

Download

Experimental research of slab cast over precast joists with prestressed reinforcement

Vestnik MGSU 3/2016
  • Koyankin Aleksandr Aleksandrovich - Siberian Federal University (SibFU) Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Building Structures and Control Systems, Siberian Federal University (SibFU), 79 Svobodny Avenue, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Topakova Aleksandrovna Topakova - Siberian Federal University (SibFU) Master student, Department of Building Structures and Control Systems, Siberian Federal University (SibFU), 79 Svobodny Avenue, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 19-25

At the present time reinforced concrete is the main construction material in civil and industrial construction. Cast-in-place and precast construction is gradually becoming a more widespread type of house-building, but still there is a lack of data, including experimental data, which allows evaluating the stress and strain state of a construction of a slab cast over precast joists. Experimental research of stress and strain state of slab cast over precast joists with prestressed reinforcement was carried out. An experimental model of a fragment of a hybrid precast/cast-in-place building was produced and tested (reduction scale 1:6). The experimental investigations of slab cast over precast joists with prestressed reinforcement proved that the construction solution of the framework offered in the previous works of the authors possess good stiffness, crack-resistance and bearing capacity. It well fits for constructing the slabs of long spans in residential and public buildings.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2016.3.19-25

Download

Experimental determination of crack resistance characteristics of fiber reinforced concrete

Vestnik MGSU 5/2014
  • Zertsalov Mikhail Grigor'evich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Department of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnics, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; +7 (495) 781-80-07; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Khoteev Egor Anatol'evich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) Master, postgraduate student, Department of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnics, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; +7 (495) 781-80-07; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 91-99

The samples of fiber reinforced concrete with different fiber concentration, types of fiber, class of concrete were tested. The values of the critical stress intensity factors were determined as well as the strength characteristics of fiber-reinforced concrete of various compositions. Tests were carried out by bending the beams of 400x100x100 mm with a cut. Critical stress intensity factor was determined with the help of the value of the breaking load. The regularities of the influence of the type and concentration of fibers on the strength characteristics of the fiber reinforced concrete were stated. The authors identified key properties of steely and polypropylene fibers and offered their comparison. From these experiments we obtained data for further use in theoretical studies of fiber reinforced concretes structures. This research revealed common patterns of change in the properties of fiber reinforced concrete, depending on the composition. The advantages of different types of fibers were discussed. Valid formula for determining the critical stress intensity factor was found. Adding fiber in different concentrations to the concrete mix increase the tensile strength 3.5-4.5 times for steel fibers and 2-2.5 times for polypropylene fibers. Polypropylene fiber addition leads to decrease in compressive strength of the concrete of up to 8 %, the steel fibers addition, on the contrary, to increase in the compressive strength of concrete up to 20 %. Increase in tensile strength is observed mostly for low-strength concrete. In order to ensure uniform distribution of fibers in the volume of concrete specific methods should be applied.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2014.5.91-99

References
  1. Antropova E.A., Drobyshev B.A., Amosov P.V. Svoystva modifitsirovannogo stalefibrobetona [Properties of the Modified Steel Fiber Concrete]. Beton i zhelezobeton [Concrete and Reinforced Concrete]. 2002, no. 3, pp. 3—6.
  2. Bocharnikov A.S., Korneev A.D. Tekhnologicheskie faktory, vliyayushchie na mikro- i makrostrukturu peskobetonnoy matritsy i prochnostnye svoystva stalefibrobetona [Technological Factors Affecting Micro-and Macrostructure of Sand Concrete Matrix and Mechanical Properties of Steel Fiber Concrete]. Tekhnologii betonov [Concrete Technologies]. 2005, no. 3, pp. 62—63.
  3. Braune Ya.A., Kravinskis V.K., Spilva M.O. Opredelenie uprugikh kharakteristik deformiruemosti dispersno-armirovannogo betona [Determination of Elastic Characteristics of Fiber Concrete Deformability]. Proektirovanie i optimizatsiya konstruktsiy inzhenernykh sooruzheniy [Design and Optimization of Engineering Structures]. Riga, RPI Publ., 1986, pp. 87—97.
  4. Braune Ya.A., Kravinskis V.K., Filipsons V.O. Statisticheskiy analiz raspredeleniya armatury i prochnost' stalefibrobetona [Statistical Analysis of the Distribution of Reinforcement and Strength of Steel Fiber Concrete]. Proektirovanie i optimizatsiya konstruktsiy inzhenernykh sooruzheniy [Design and Optimization of Engineering Structures]. Riga, RPI Publ., 1982, pp. 89—95.
  5. Volkov I.V. Fibrobeton sostoyanie i perspektivy primeneniya v stroitel'nykh konstruktsiyakh [Fiber Concrete Condition and Prospects of Application in Building Structures]. Stroitel'nye materialy, oborudovanie, tekhnologii XXI veka [Building Materials, Equipment, Technologies of the 21st Century]. 2004, no. 5, pp. 24—25.
  6. Kosarev V.M. Raschet prochnosti po normal'nym secheniyam izgibaemykh elementov s khaotichnym diskretnym armirovaniem [Strength Calculation for Normal Sections of Bent Elements with Chaotic Discrete Reinforcement]. Fibrobeton i ego primenenie v stroitel'stve [Fibrous Concrete and its Application in Construction]. Moscow, NIIZhB Publ., 1979, pp. 20—26.
  7. Kurbatov L.G., Popov V.I. Treshchinostoykost' i raskrytie treshchin v izgibaemykh stalefibrobetonnykh elementakh [Crack Resistance and Crack Opening in Bent Steel Fiber Concrete Elements]. Prostranstvennye konstruktsii v grazhdanskom stroitel'stve [Spatial Design in Civil Engineering]. Leningrad, LenZNIIEP Publ., 1982, pp. 33—42.
  8. Rusanov V.E. Opredelenie prochnostnykh i deformativnykh svoystv stalefibrobetona dlya rascheta tonnel'nykh obdelok [Determination of Strength and Deformation Properties of Steel Fiber Concrete for Tunnel Lining Calculation]. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2010, no. 2, pp. 189—197.
  9. Rusanov V.E. K otsenke effektivnosti primeneniya fibrobetona v sbornykh tonnel'nykh obdelkakh [Evaluating the Effectiveness of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Application in Precast Tunnel Lining]. Transportnoe stroitel'stvo [Transport Construction]. 2010, no. 3, pp. 13—16.
  10. Kagan M. Sravnenie fakticheskoy prochnosti na szhatie blokov iz betona i stalefibrobetona [Comparison of the Actual Compressive Strength of Concrete and Steel Fiber Concrete Blocks]. Metrostroy [Constructing Metro]. 1987, no. 3, pp. 19—22.
  11. Rizkalla Sami, Hassan Tarek. Effectiveness of FRP for Strengthening Concrete Bridges. Structural Engineering International. 2002, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 89—95. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2749/101686602777965577.
  12. Colin D. Johnston. Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete. CoComposits. 1982, no. 2, pp. 113—121.
  13. Bernard E.S. Influence of Test Machine Control Method on Flexural Performance of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams. Journal of ASTM International. 2009, vol. 6, no. 9. DOI: 10.1520/JAI102327.
  14. Plizzari G.A., Tiberti G. Structural Behavior of SFRC Tunnel Segments // Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures. Vol. 3. High Performance Concrete, Brick Masonry and Environmental Aspects. Catania, June 17—22, 2007, pp. 1577—1584.
  15. Vandewalle L., etc. Recommendations of RILEM TC 162-TDF: Test and Design Methods for Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete — Sigma-epsilon design method. Materials and Structures. 2000, vol. 33, pp. 75—81.

Download

Fracture mechanics and modern scientific research of building materials

Vestnik MGSU 12/2013
  • Oreshkin Dmitriy Vladimirovich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) Doctor of Technical Sciences, Chair, Department of Construction Materials; +7 (499) 183-32-29., Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 180-183

The article examines the modern monographs on fracture mechanics, strength, durability and crack resistance of building materials of the following European authors: Zaitsev U.V., Leonovich S.N., Schneider U., Eberhardshtayner E. The article presents the biographical data about the authors, their achievements in education and science, as well as the summary and analysis of the considered monographs.In the book of Zaitsev and Leonovich "The Strength and Durability of Structural Materials with Crack" the authors state, that the increase in reliability and durability of building structures and reinforced concrete structures the same as increase in concrete strength and optimization of its nonrigid features is one of the ways of solving urgent problems in the field of construction.The authors of the monograph "Structure, Strength and Fracture Mechanics of Concrete under Biaxial and Triaxial Compression" present the results of experimental and theoretical studies of the behavior of the common, extra strong, centrifugalled concretes and haydite concrete of various structures.In the monograph "Strength and Fracture Toughness of Structural Building Materials under Complex Stress State" the results of experimental and theoretical studies of the wood and concrete of various structures behavior under Biaxial and Triaxial Compression are presented.The monographs are destined for postgraduate students, candidates for a doctor's degree, scientific and engineering-technical workers of scientific and research centers and engineering companies.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2013.12.180-183

References
  1. Zaytsev Yu.V., Leonovich S.N. Prochnost' i dolgovechnost' konstruktsionnykh materialov s treshchinoy [The Strength and Durability of Structural Materials with Crack]. Minsk, BNTU Publ., 2010, 362 p.
  2. Zaytsev Yu.V., Leonovich S.N., Shnayder U. Struktura, prochnost' i mekhanika razrusheniya betonov pri dvukhosnom i trekhosnom szhatii [Structure, Strength and Fracture Mechanics of Concrete under Biaxial and Triaxial Compression]. Minsk, BNTU Publ., 2011, 382 p.
  3. Eberkhardshtayner Y., Leonovich S.N., Zaytsev Yu.V. Prochnost' i treshchinostoykost' konstruktsionnykh stroitel'nykh materialov pri slozhnom napryazhennom sostoyanii [Strength and Fracture Toughness of Structural Building Materials under Complex Stress State]. Minsk, BNTU Publ., 2013, 522 p.

Download

Results 1 - 8 of 8