-
Burkov Vladimir Nikolaevich -
V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences
Doctor of Science, Head of Laboratory, V.A., V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences, 65 Profsoyuznaya str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.
-
Titarenko Boris Petrovich -
V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences
Doctor of Science, Professor, Professor, Department of Applied Mathematics, V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences, 65 Profsoyuznaya str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.
This paper shows that quite a large number of economic mechanisms reducing risk of occurrence of an emergency situation have been designed. These mechanisms are understood as complexes of interrelated evidence-based policies, procedures and methodological solutions that provide optimal economic forms of regulation in the field of safety management and risk management at the federal, regional and facility levels. The paper shows the management model and emphasizes the major economic mechanisms for managing safety level: economic responsibility mechanisms, risk redistribution mechanisms, mechanisms for generation and usage of budgetary and extra-budgetary funds, incentive mechanisms for the enhanced safety level, reservation mechanisms in case of emergencies.
DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2017.5.559-563
-
Marichev Pavel Aleksandrovich -
Main Scientific Metrological Center of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Head of Department, Main Scientific Metrological Center of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, 13 Komarova str., Mytischi, Moscow oblast, 141006, Russian Federation.
-
Kornev Aleksey Sergeevich -
Main Scientific Metrological Center Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Head of Laboratory, Main Scientific Metrological Center Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, 13 Komarova str., Mytischi, Moscow oblast, 141006, Russian Federation.
-
Khayrullin Rustam Zinnatullovich -
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Senior Researcher, Professor of Applied Mathematics Department, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoye shosse, Moscow,129337, Russian Federation.
Article studies the problem of development of optimal plans of funding of activities for procurement and repair of particular samples of measuring equipment (ME) for the stock including several types of ME, under various restrictions for the funding. As the underlying research method, the simplex method for solving of a linear programming problem with equalities and inequalities constraints is used. It is assumed that as per the level of technical excellence the equipment can be modern or outdated, and as per the level of technical condition - operable or faulty. Mathematical model for record keeping of transitions of ME samples from an operable state into a faulty state is worked out. It is shown that, within the framework of this model, the indicators of modernity and operability of measuring equipment stock (MES) are linked by a linear dependence. As the optimality criterion, the MES modernity indicator is used; the MES operability indicator and operability indicators for each ME type are used as the constraints. While studying possible rational financing options, the modernity indicators for different types of ME also are used. Results of solving of the basic problem for different values of funding amounts for procurement and repairs are presented. Structure and sequence of optimal funding is revealed.
DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2017.5.564-571
-
Silka Dmitriy Nikolaevich -
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Economics and Management in Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation.
-
Ivanova Marina Aleksandrovna -
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
post-graduate student, Department of Economics and Management in Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation.
Economic sustainability of any organization, including small organizations of investment and construction sector, has a complex and ambiguous concept. Sustainable development of organization is a continuous process of permanent dynamic changes in which there is a close consistency between such integral elements as: efficient use of resources, scientific and technical development of organization, implementation of various innovations in production process, improving of staff competence, and institutional changes. They all are aimed at optimization of existing and future potential of organization, satisfaction of needs and achievement of set strategic objectives. Under conditions of instability of market economy, the achievement of effective sustainable development of enterprise and its integration into the existing organization management becomes one of the most important tasks. The article offers to perform a comparative analysis within the framework of projections, with the purpose of identifying of “threats” by external factors and “advantages” by internal factors. This will help to identify the most serious “threats” as well as the most powerful “advantages” for further development of strategy for improving of sustainability of small enterprises of the investment and construction industry. It is also assumed that there is a possibility of use of small business advantages with the aim of reducing of negative effect of “threats” by external factors by way of targeting of these advantages. Analysis of “threats” by external factors and “advantages” by internal factors demonstrated that each aggregate of “threats” can be opposed to the aggregate of “advantages” within the corresponding projection. If the growth of small enterprise characteristics is smooth enough it can be said of sustainable development of this enterprise.
DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2017.5.572-580
-
Titarenko Boris Petrovich -
V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences
Doctor of Science, Professor, Professor, Department of Applied Mathematics, V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences, 65 Profsoyuznaya str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.
-
Burkov Vladimir Nikolaevich -
V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences
Doctor of Science, Head of Laboratory, V.A., V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences, 65 Profsoyuznaya str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.
The paper shows the management model and emphasizes the major economic mechanisms for managing safety level: economic responsibility mechanisms, risk redistribution mechanisms, mechanisms for generation and usage of budgetary and extra-budgetary funds, incentive mechanisms for the enhanced safety level, reservation mechanisms in case of emergencies. A large number of economic mechanisms have been designed as complexes of interrelated evidence-based policies which provide optimal economic forms of regulation in the field of safety management and risk management at the federal, regional and facility levels.
DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2017.5.581-585